Ummite Physics and Metaphysics "The Essential Texts"

 

 
What does the flow of time consist of? Is it an illusion? Take any object: a fruit. Even if have not yet developed the concept of subatomic particles yet, we have already suggested in other documents that each atomic component is actually an IBOZOO UU. The fruit will be composed of water, carbohydrate, proteins and other organic chemical components. Those in turn will be composed of NIIO A (atoms) and these by subparticles; each one of them being an IBOZOO UU with its OAXOO (axes) directed in a particular way.

When we measure on our watch a one microsecond interval: is the orange we have in our hand the same on we held a moment before? An Earth chemist will say: actually it is not the same because in its core, in its cells, the process of metabolism has modified its characteristics.

The physicist will say: NO, its electrons have varied their position in their orbitals. But if we ask him now if these electrons, which have a different position, are the same ones as before; perhaps he will answer: YES.

But it is an error: there was a jump of the IBOZOO UU which before represented the electron E1 of orbital O1 of the atom A1, and it is not the same one.

A layman in physics will better understand this example. Imagine a frame formed by a mosaic of electric bulbs (D59_FG30).

D59_FG30

At time T1 the bulbs to form a capital letter A are lit. But one moment afterwards, t2, time has moved. The A is the same but its components have varied. One has turned off certain bulbs and lit others. The illusion of continuity is the same, but the A seems to move along the mosaic of lamps.

D59_FG31

One is not yet turned off when the following one starts to light up. (D59_FG31); the Eb electron of our example which was only one IBOZOO UU, becomes Ec one moment later.

D59_FG32

If you consider the WAAM to be the integration of all the IBOZOO UU " (past, present and future "), that which call ourselves (Me, now) then we can represent it on a plane as in image D59_FG32.

If  I am at a " point " P represented by an IBOZOO UU with its Tp (OAXOO) directed vertically, what will happen tomorrow? " I " will be in T'p (another IBOZOO UU) which I will call the future (1)

But; what happens on the plane of " ME, NOW " at another point separated from me by a distance D, i.e. a chain of IBOZOO UU? Quite simply that the orientation of its (OAXOO) Tu (axis of time) will be different. Thus I cannot say that there is simultaneity of TIME. I cannot thus say for example " NOW " something is occuring on the planet VENUS for such a concept of simultaneity does not make sense (AND SIMILARLY FOR EVERYTHING WITHIN THE SAME FRAME OF REFERENCE).

 
(1) By saying ME, we do not refer to an OEMII (person) composed of trillions of IBOZOO UU, but to an elementary subparticle of my organisation: a proton for example. You can see that the Earth physicist Einstein designed a universe which in some ways was not so different from that which we are describing to you. You must only replace the "SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM" "by "SET OF the IBOZOO UU. " Einstein's model also agrees with ours on other essential points. But Einstein was only unaware that what he regarded as the CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT is only so in one of the possible systems of reference (for the same three-dimensional system, the speed of light or speed limit is constant).. He was unaware that there were other three-dimensional frameworks than the one familiar to us. Our design of the WAAM explains certain contradictions that the physicists of the Earth found between quantum Mechanics and the relativity model.