Ummite Physics and Metaphysics "The Essential Texts"

 

BASIC SUBPARTICLES

When we describe our models of MASS and ENERGY, it is necessary for us at every moment to establish the differences and the resemblances between the current ideas of a physicist of planet UMMO and another of OYAAGAA (EARTH).

Above all, we underline that in spite of certain differences concerning the true nature of certain factors which are familiar to you (like SPIN), we accept as valid many Earth discoveries, even if we interpret them in a different way.

To illustrate what is meant by this, here are some concrete examples of coincidences.

You have measured the Mass of the PROTON, of the ELECTRON, of many MESONS and HYPERONS, and have noted the difference in MASS of the NEUTRON and PHOTON.

We corroborate the existence of what you call PARTICLES, and we confirm that the measurement of their relative rest-mass is correct. The difference appears when interpreting the true nature of these alleged particles (we will explain this further).

 
Now an example of a difference as pertaining to the CONCEPT itself.

You have an important parameter that you call SPIN or INTRINSIC MOMENT and you " know " that it is quantified by five measurements. (Some Physicists of the Earth interpreted this SPIN as a ROTATION of the PARTICLE by assigning a MOMENT for its measurement).

We, on the other hand, know that such a rotation does not exist, and that the quantification of its value is a error because if within a three-dimensional framework the Number of values is finite, the possible orientations of the " quadric " of the OAWOO which you interpret as SPIN, could never be measured correctly.

Finally, we point out another assumption of yours which we have rejected as entirely false: Certain physicists of the Earth currently conceive the PROTON as being formed of MESONS. To follow this erroneous path could delay Earth research in the field of physics for many years. The primitive assumption which consisted in viewing the Proton as an indivisible particle is closer to reality.
 

A COMPARISON FOR PEOPLE LITTLE-VERSED IN PHYSICS

During the last several years, the physicists of OYAAGAA have delved deeper into the intimate nature of matter. Little by little you have obtained a catalogue of a series of particles to which you assign a series of parameters whose measurement is possible using your current laboratory instruments.

Thus you are able to measure the MASS at rest and its actual energy, its electric charge, its SPIN and its ORBITAL MOMENT. You may not know all these characteristics of a particle at a given moment but you have the possibility of locating it in a definite point.

However many physicists suppose that a particle has a reality (either as a phenomenon concentrated in an environment of limited radius, or as a real quantity or Quantum of ENERGY, without being able to define the size and the position of it). However without INTERACTIONS, and before the possible collision with another particle, the particle can follow a path which you can visualise (in a NIELLO chamber for instance), all the while preserving its initial attributes of MASS, SPIN, ORBIT, CHARGE and ENERGY.
 

Before continuing, we will give you two schematic comparisons.

You employ during your popular festivals a chain of rockets surrounded by a continuous wick (in Spain you call this a CHAIN (of firecrackers (ndt))

Imagine that an observer sees a street far away on which one of these chains has been extended D59_FG33 (NDS: drawing illegible on the photocopied document). When the first firecracker explodes, a OEMII runs while carrying a sparkler in a direction parallel to the chain. The firecrackers on the chain explode one after the other very quickly and can cause the optical illusion for our observer that it is a LIGHT running along the cord. He will think he sees two LIGHTS moving in parallel trajectories:

- the runner with the sparkler

- the sequential firing of the firecrackers.

He will perhaps not see the difference, and may even believe that there are two people running with sparklers.

You thus see the difference between these two PHYSICAL conceptions. The PHYSICISTS of OYAAGAA would accept the " version " of the runner with the sparkler. The Physicists of our Planet know that the movement of particles could be compared to the metaphor of the chain of firecrackers.

If a radioactive mineral emits B (Beta) rays, you believe that the electron which started from the substance is the same one which, after a few centimetres, collides with, for instance, an oxygen molecule.

Our model differs enormously from this image. The ELECTRON IN ITSELF DOES NOT EXIST (just like one cannot say that a flash or an explosion exists in the firecracker). YES there is a chain of IBOZOO UU invisible to our eyes and to our instruments because of the particular orientation of these OAWOO (axes) . Moreover certain OAWOO of each component of this series, or chain, change direction consecutively, only to return to their initial orientation.

This is what gives the illusion of movement, and it is imperceptible to the senses and escapes your current instruments.

It is not possible to conceive of an ISOLATED PARTICLE outside the WAAM (cosmos), just as it would be unimaginable to think of a WAVE of the ocean not associated with WATER.

Not only is ENERGY quantified (and here the Earth physicists were not mistaken) but so is the MAGNITUDE "DISTANCES". (It is impossible to distinguish "a real quantity " smaller than 12.^-13 cm, which is the angular relationship between two dependent or related IBOZOO UU) . Specifically, a SUBATOMIC PARTICLE has as its base an IBOZOO UU and another which is RELATED (We use the word RELATED for we do not find another more adapted in your language; we believe that the word ADJACENT would suggest a positioning of the IBOZOO UU and we have already pointed out that an IBOZOO UU exists but that one cannot position it)..
 

We will try to represent a AYUU (network) of IBOZOO UU in an ideal plane so that none of the IBOZOO UU direct one of their OAWOO (axes) perpendicularly to the Fictitious Plane that we have traced. (D59_FG34)

D59_FG34

We say that A is " related " with VDU (DUU OII) and that VDU is DUU OII (related) with Y.

An OEMII will consider this network as " EMPTY " and will erroneously identify it with NOTHING. For her there is no MATTER, nor a GRAVITATIONAL or ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD, nor WEAK INTERACTIONS, nor NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS. In short she will extrapolate this AYUU (network) from the COSMOS she knows.

 But imagine that the IBOZOO UU in ORANGE directs one of its OAWOO, which we call OAWOOYEY, at an angle represented in image D59_FG35 of A = P/6 radians. D59_fg35 (NdR: Missing in the document received and unfortunately we do not have the rest of this D59... document)