Ummite Physics and Metaphysics "The Essential Texts"

 

Excerpts letter D52

By studying the true nature of the particles or entities which you call Proton, Meson, Neutrino, Electron, etc our specialists discovered that there are actually small deformations of space incorrecly named three-dimensional in the axis of other dimensions. Imagine a very wide cloth. This would be the comparison of Three-dimensional Space we would call a vacuum. If we now make a small hollow or deformation in the cloth, it could represent the mass of a proton or even a meson, depending as much on the Axis of the deformation as on its magnitude or depth.

Now. If you look at the cloth from one side, you will see a concavity (proton), but if you look at it from the back, you will see instead a convexity or protuberance (Antiproton). Moreover, depending on your position from various points of view, this deformation can appear more or less oblique to you, i.e. applied in different axes or dimensions, thus appearing to be sometimes a Neutron or even some another subatomic particle at other times.

In a word, the interpretation of such a particle will depend on the observer's system of reference. This is why physicists of the Earth are so perplexed when they discover hundreds of subatomic particles, which seem to have no end. In reality you are chasing shadows. (this last point is not a criticism of Earth scientific research in the field of Quantum and Nuclear Physics inasmuch as you continue to analyse the various characteristics of these particles, but because you regard them as different entities.

With this the editors make a point of adding note 4 of the document on UEWA OEMM (spacecraft), which includes some specifics on the IBOZOO UU:
 

To understand the effect of OAWOENNIUU (nuclear resonance) we would have to explain our theory of the fundamental makeup of space and matter. I will try to formulate a summary by using concepts which are familiar to you.

Suppose for example a numerically reduced whole of molybdenum atoms: for example Mo1, Mo2, Mo3...Mo114 whose nuclei have the characteristic, in one determined instant, of having a configuration identical to their energy levels as per the distribution of the nucleons. The fact that the quantum levels of their electronic shell are different, or that the orbits of these are distributed in an unspecified chemical sequence, then makes us say that these atoms are OAWOOENI (in resonance)

We also know that an unspecified atomic particle (neutron, proton, kaon, etc.) is actually a different projection, within a three-dimensional framework, of a same mathematically-true entity that we call IBOZOO UU (up to where we grant in the WAAM (universe) the attribute of truth or existence to the IBOZOO UU)

You can think of the IBOZOO UU by a didactic image, as "a beam "or "package "of " ideal axes "from which the various multi-directional orientations would give rise to a physicist interpreting this "beam "or "cluster "(or " hedgehog ") with multiple directed points, sometimes as a quantum, other times as a mass, an electric charge, an orbital moment, etc. They represent actually the various axial orientations of the IBOZOO UU in the same way that different chromatic tones have as their bases different frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum.

Imagine that we try to disorientate, within the Mo1 atom, only one nucleon (a proton for example); it can happen that the inversion is not absolute, in this case you would observe a conversion of the mass of the proton into energy.

DE = m C² + K, m being the mass of the proton and K a constant.

A Niobium isotope is thus obtained. But we can force the confusion of "the axes "of the IBOZOO UU (absolute inversion) in a manner such that an observant physicist would see, much to their surprise, that the proton would seem to be destroyed without a release of energy. This phenomenon would seem to you to contradict the universal principle of conservation of mass and energy (a conservation called into question by other Earth physicists; indeed the assumptions formulated by some of your scientists on the true creation of matter in the universe are actually based on the fact that indeed the sets of IBOZOO UU are reversed completely within our three-dimensional framework, being observable by those who live there).

You will then see a negatively-ionized Niobium atom. Without a doubt, the remainder of the n-1 Molybdenum atoms have undergone a deterioration in their nuclear energy levels, so that the nucleic energy of each one of these atoms develops as:

Checking that:

R1 = radial Distances to the Niobium atom from each remaining Mo atom.

: "constants "of the system whose values are a function not only of N, but also of the structures of the nuclei of R1.

The energy transferred to the remaining nuclei by this resonance effect is quantified so as to be able to arrive at being zero for an atom from the group located at a distance R, higher than the defined threshold.

Thus, if we manage to excite a Molybdenum atom (Mo1) located in a transmitting body (image C) by inverting one of its nucleons, we will observe in a receiving body containing another Mo2, a quantum deterioration in the latter, all the higher since there will be fewer parasitic atoms in resonance in the vicinity. We should point out that the transfer of energy does not happen by means of an excitative field so that the time of transmission is zero (we then speak of transfer speed or infinite information flows).

This physical principle would apparently facilitate the development of an instantaneous communication system for enormous interplanetary distances, so that a message would not take several light-years to arrive at destination.

Unfortunately, this is unrealizable in practice, for the existence of free "disturbing" or parasitic atoms, in resonance with the transmitter, would absorb all the energy of the system. A quantifiable part of it could thus never be transferred by resonance to so distant an atom. With the result that there are no masses in the vicinity of the Network of a similar chemical element to attenuate the transmitted signals.

image C